| Form 0-135-150 |
|
|
|
|
USD# |
|
|
389 |
| 5/2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| USD Form 150 |
| 2011-2012 |
| ESTIMATED LEGAL MAXIMUM GENERAL FUND BUDGET |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| General
Fund Budget – Lines 1 through 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1. Estimated 9-20-2011 FTE enrollment
(from Table I or Table IV) (Exclude 4 yr old at-risk FTE.) |
|
|
= |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2. Estimated 9-20-2011 4yr old at risk
FTE enrollment (e) (Must be approved.)(At-risk students count as .5 FTE) |
|
|
|
|
15.0 |
+ |
0.0 |
(Table IV, Line 4) |
|
|
= |
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3. Total Estimated 9-20-2011 FTE
Enrollment (Line 1 + Line 2) |
|
|
|
|
= |
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4. Estimated low enrollment and high
enrollment for districts.
9-20-2011 FTE enrollment |
|
|
|
|
| (from line 3) |
15.0 |
x |
#N/A |
factor (from Table II or
pages 5, 6) |
|
= |
#N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5. Estimated weighted bilingual education
enrollment. 9-20-2011 bilingual |
|
|
|
= |
0.0 |
| FTE (a) |
0.0000 |
+ |
0.0000 |
(Table IV, Line 5) x
0.395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6. Estimated weighted vocational
education enrollment. 9-20-2011
vocational education |
|
|
|
|
| FTE(b) |
29.1667 |
+ |
0.0000 |
(Table IV, Line 6) x 0.5 |
|
|
= |
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7. Estimated weighted at-risk student
enrollment(c). Number of eligible
students that qualify for free lunches |
|
|
|
| as of 9-20-2011 |
320 |
+ |
0 |
(Table IV, Line 7) x
0.456 |
|
|
= |
145.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8. Estimated High At-Risk Weighting. (Can only qualify for one of the
following) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
District's calculated free lunch percentage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Comes from Table VI, Line 4) |
0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District's calculated students per square mile: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 3 / square miles in district = 15 / 580 = |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| a. Number of students eligible for free
lunch (at least 50%) |
|
|
(320+0)
x |
0.1 |
= |
0.0 |
| b. Number of students eligible for free
lunches at 35.1% and 212.1 students per square mile. |
(320+0)
x |
0.1 |
= |
0.0 |
| c. Number of students eligible for free
lunches (40-50%) |
|
|
(320+0)
x |
0.06 |
= |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9.
Est. Non-Proficient student weighting. Number of non-proficient students.
(g) ( |
16 |
x |
0.0465 |
) |
= |
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10. Estimated weighted FTE for new
facilities. 9-20-2011 enrollment
of students attending a |
|
|
|
|
| new facility (d) |
0.0 |
+ |
0.0 |
(Table IV, Line 9) x 0.25 |
|
|
= |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11. Estimated weighted FTE for
transportation. (Table III, Line
5) |
|
|
|
|
= |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12. Estimated weighted FTE virtual
enrollment. (Table V, Line
4) |
|
|
|
|
= |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13.
Estimated ancillary facilities weighting. Amt approved by Court of Tax Appeals |
0 |
Ö |
$3,780 |
|
= |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14.
Estimated Special Education weighting. Amount of Sp. Ed. Funding (f) |
622,350 |
Ö |
$3,780 |
|
= |
164.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15.
Estimated Declining Enrollment weighting. Amt apprvd by Court of Tax Appeals |
0 |
Ö |
$3,780 |
|
= |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16. Estimated FHSU Math & Science
Academy FTE enrollment |
|
|
|
|
= |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17. Estimated 2011-2012 operating
budget. (Lines 3 through 16) |
#N/A |
x |
$3,780 |
|
= |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18. Estimated Cost of Living weighting |
$0 |
|
Ö |
$3,780 |
|
= |
0.0 |
|
|
|
(maximum allowed for this district) |
(Amt district will use,
up to the maximum) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19.
Estimated 2011-2012 operating budget. (Include Cost of Living and FHSU) |
#N/A |
x |
$3,780 |
|
= |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20. Amount to transfer to General Fund
(Form 149, Line 5). |
|
|
|
|
= |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 21.
Total General Fund Budget Authority (Form 150 Line 19 + Line 20) |
|
|
|
= |
$0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Local
Option Budget -- See Form 155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 22. Estimated 2011-2012 LOB General Fund
budget (excludes 2011-2012 Spec Ed and FHSU weightings & includes 2008-09
Spec Ed) |
|
|
|
|
#N/A |
562,510 |
|
(2008-09 Spec Ed) |
= |
#N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (a) FTE is computed by taking the total
clock hours of bilingual students who are enrolled and attending in an |
|
|
| approved bilingual
class on 9-20-2011 and dividing by 6 (cannot exceed 6 hours for an individual
student). Total |
|
|
| clock hours |
0.0 |
Ö 6 = |
0.0000 |
(Record on Line 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (b) FTE is computed by taking the total
clock hours of vocational education students who are enrolled and
attending |
|
|
| in an approved
vocational class on 9-20-2011 and dividing by 6 (cannot exceed 6 hours for an
individual student). Total |
|
|
| clock hours |
175.0 |
Ö 6 = |
29.1667 |
(Record on Line 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (c) USD must have an approved at-risk
pupil assistance plan for the school district. |
|
|
|
|
| (d) In order to access new facilities
weighting, a USD must have adopted at least a 25% LOB. |
|
|
|
|
| (e) Four year old at risk students are
counted as .5 FTE. USD must be
approved by the Kansas State Department |
|
|
| of Education. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (f) Comes from form 118 (line 20). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (g)
2010-2011 Non Proficient students (excluding free students). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (NOTE: If September 20 falls on a weekend,
the following Monday will be the official count date.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE I |
|
USD# |
|
|
389 |
| Declining
Enrollment Calculation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1. September 20, 2010, FTE and February 20, 2011 FTE enrollment
(Excludes 4 yr old at risk students.) |
|
= |
608.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2. September 20, 2011, FTE enrollment
(Excludes 4 yr old at risk students.) |
|
|
|
= |
585.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3. 3 YR AVG FTE: ( |
595.5 |
+ |
608.9 |
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9/20/2009 FTE)* |
|
(line 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585.0 |
)/3= |
596.5 |
|
|
|
|
= |
596.5 |
|
(line 2) |
|
(goes to line 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| * Excludes 4 yr old
at risk students, but includes 2/20/2010 military students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4. FTE enrollment for budget purposes
(higher of line 1, 2, or 3)(Goes to page 1, line 1 if no military provision;
see Table IV.) |
= |
608.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TABLE II |
| Low and High Enrollment Weighting |
| Enrollment
of District |
|
|
Factor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 - 99.9 |
|
|
|
1.014331 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 100 - 299.9 |
|
|
|
{[7337 - 9.655 (E - 100)]Ö3642.4} -1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 300
- 1,621.9 |
|
|
{[5406 - 1.237500 (E - 300)]Ö3642.4} -1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 1622
and over |
|
|
0.03504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 'E'
is 9-20-2011 Adjusted FTE Enrollment (from Page 1, line 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| EXAMPLE: (FTE of 954.0) |
|
|
FOR COMPUTED FACTORS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEE 2011-2012 LOW
ENROLLMENT |
|
|
|
| {[5406
- 1.237500 (954.0 - 300)]Ö3642.4}-1 |
AND HIGH ENROLLMENT
FACTOR |
|
|
|
| {[5406
- 1.237500 (654.0)]Ö3642.4}-1 |
|
TABLE (PAGES 5 AND 6) |
|
|
|
|
| {[5406
- 809.325]Ö3642.4}-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| {4597.675Ö3642.4}
-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.261991-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.261991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TABLE III |
| Transportation Weighting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1. Area of district in square miles
9-20-2011. |
|
|
|
|
= |
580.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2. All public pupils transported or for
whom transportation is being made available 9-20-2011 |
|
|
|
|
| who reside in the
district 2.5 miles or more (Estimated) |
180.0 |
+ |
0.0 |
(Table IV) |
= |
180.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Line 8) |
|
|
| 3. Index of density = Line 2 |
180.0 |
divided by Line 1 |
580.0 |
|
= |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4. Using index of density (Line 3),
determine amount from density table on attached pages 7 and 8. |
|
= |
0.0000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5. Estimated weighted FTE for
transportation. 9-20-2011 number
of resident students over |
|
|
|
|
| 2.5 miles (line 2) |
180.0 |
x |
0.0000 |
factor (Line 4) (to Line
11, Page 1) |
|
= |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|